LCA comprises four key steps: (1) goal and scope definition, (2) inventory analysis, (3) impact assessment, and (4) interpretation. LCA methodology is particularly challenged by spatiotemporal limitations during inventory analysis (where the material-energy balances of products are compiled) and impact assessment (where inventories are translated into environmental impacts). While methods to quantify land-related life cycle impacts are increasingly established, land use inventories are largely lacking. LCA relies on such data inventories which are particularly important because land use impacts are localized and site dependent. Energy systems planning models (e.g., integrated assessment models, capacity expansion and grid operations / dispatch optimization models) are similarly challenged by scarcity of robust datasets at a time when land use constraints are increasingly important for the transition to a net zero future. As a result, large inconsistencies persist for life cycle assessment and energy systems models that examine land use. ETAPA research on quantifying the land use of energy infrastructure has focused on three areas (1) manual delineation using geographic information systems (GIS) where datasets are sufficiently small (typically 1 to 500 infrastructure elements), (2) supervised classification where analyses will be time intensive (typically around 500 infrastructure elements), and (3) combining energy infrastructure data with machine learning methods (typically 500 to >100,000 infrastructure elements).
All ETPA's published articles are available to view here. An asterisk (*) after an author's name denotes a postdoctoral scholar, graduate or undergraduate student. ‡ denotes shared first authorship.
Articles in refereed journals
Land Resources for Wind Energy Development Requires Regionalized Characterization
*Dai, T.*, Jose, J. M., Zhao, Y., Zheng,* S., Sun, Y., Patel, V. M., and S. M. Jordaan.* (2024).
Environmental Science & Technology, 8(11): 5014–5023; IF=10.8.
US Ethane Emissions and Trends Estimated from Atmospheric Observations
*Zhang, M.*, I. Vimont, S. M. Jordaan, L. Hu, K. McKain, M. Crotwell, D. Gaeta, S. Miller.* (2024).
Environmental Science & Technology; IF=10.8.
The Life Cycle Land Use of Natural Gas-Fired Electricity in the US Western Interconnection
*Dai, T.*, Jose, J. M., Patel, V. M., and S. M. Jordaan.* (2023).
Environmental Science: Advances, 2(5), pp.815-826; IF=3.5 (self-reported, new open-source journal).
Standardized metrics to quantify solar energy-land relationships
*Cagle, A. E.*, M. Shepherd, S. M. Grodsky, A. Armstrong, S. M. Jordaan, R. R. Hernandez.* (2023).
Frontiers in Sustainability, 3, p.1035705; Cite score=3.3 (self-reported, new open-source journal).
Life cycle impacts of land use on ecosystem services of concentrated solar power generation in the United States
*Rangarajan, S.*, Hernandez, R. R., and S. M. Jordaan.* (2022).
Frontiers in Sustainability, 3, p.1021971; Cite score=3.3 (self-reported, new open-source journal).
Comments on: Land use for United States power generation: A critical review of existing metrics with suggestions for going forward
Hernandez, R. R., Cagle, A., Grodsky, S. M., Exley, G., and S. M. Jordaan.* (2022).
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 166, p.112526; IF=16.3.
Quantifying the ecosystem services values of electricity generation in the US Chihuahuan Desert: A life cycle perspective
*Jordaan, S. M.*, J. Lee.,* M. McClung, and M. Moran.* (2021).
Journal of Industrial Ecology; IF=4.9.
Understanding the life cycle surface land requirements of natural gas-fired electricity
*Jordaan, S. M.*, G. A. Heath, J. Macknick, E. Mohammadi,* D. Ben-Horin, V. Urrea and D. Marceau.* (2017).
Nature Energy, 2:804–812; IF=49.7.
A life cycle perspective on land use and project economics of electricity from wind and anaerobic digestion
*Ciliberti, C.*, S. M. Jordaan, S. V. Smith, S. Spatari.* (2016).
Energy Policy, 89:52–63; IF=9.3.
Land and water impacts of oil sands production in Alberta
*Jordaan, S. M.* (2012).
Environmental Science & Technology, 46(7): 3611–3617; IF=10.8.
Land use greenhouse gas emissions from conventional oil and oil sands production
*Yeh, S.*, S. M. Jordaan, A. Brandt, S. Spatari, M. Turetksy, D. W. Keith.* (2010).
Environmental Science & Technology, 44(22):8766–8772; IF=10.8.
Quantifying land use of oil sands production: a life cycle perspective
*Jordaan, S. M.*, D. W. Keith, B. Stelfox.* (2009).
Environmental Research Letters, 4:024004.