Globally, countries including Canada that are undergoing an energy transition to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are well-served by environmental LCA. LCA is a key industrial ecology tool that provides a systematic method by which environmental burdens of products and processes can be quantified from materials extraction through waste disposal (cradle-to-grave). An ongoing challenge exists for LCA in decision support for sustainable energy: it is a temporally static tool that does not capture the spatial patterns of infrastructure. Present advances in LCA include how to capture spatial and temporal variations across fuel supply through end use. Little work has been completed to better understand novel geospatial LCAs of energy systems can more accurately characterize environmental impacts and improve the outcomes of decisions. ETAPA adapts and improves methods for energy systems by integrating enhanced data science and geospatial methods into LCA. In addition to this improvement, we have advanced global-scale life cycle assessment with several coarser-scale studies that quantify country-level life cycle impacts and carbon footprints, demonstrating variation that depends on the infrastructure in each country. ETAPA data are valuable across many fields, which further catalyzes collaborations across disciplines who benefit from their use.
All ETPA's published articles are available to view here. An asterisk (*) after an author's name denotes a postdoctoral scholar, graduate or undergraduate student. ‡ denotes shared first authorship.
Articles in refereed journals
The Life Cycle Land Use of Natural Gas-Fired Electricity in the US Western Interconnection
*Dai, T.,* Jose, J. M., Patel, V. M., and S. M. Jordaan. (2023).
Environmental Science: Advances, 2(5), pp.815-826
Air pollution co-benefits from electric transmission and distribution systems
*Nock, D., L. Janicke, K. Surana, and S. M. Jordaan. (2023).
Energy, 269, p.126735
Life cycle impacts of land use on ecosystem services of concentrated solar power generation in the United States
*Rangarajan, S.*, Hernandez, R. R., and S. M. Jordaan. (2022).
Frontiers in Sustainability, 3, p.1021971
Global mitigation opportunities for the life cycle of gas-fired power
*Jordaan, S. M., Ruttinger,* A. W., Surana, K., Nock, D., Miller, S. M., and A. P. Ravikumar. (2022).
Nature Climate Change, 2(11), pp.1059-1067
Gaussian Process Regression as a Replicable, Streamlined Approach to Inventory and Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment
*Dai, T.,* S. M. Jordaan, and A. Wemhoff. (2022).
Environmental Science & Technology, 56(6): 3821–3829
The implications of generation efficiencies and supply chain leaks for the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from natural gas-fired electricity
*Tavakkoli, S.,* L. Feng, S. Miller, and S. M. Jordaan. (2022).
Environmental Science & Technology, 56(4):2540–2550
Spatiotemporal energy infrastructure datasets for the United States: A review
*Tavakkoli, S.,* Macknick, J., Heath, G.A., and S. M. Jordaan. (2021).
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 152:111616
Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation: a systematic review of spatiotemporal methods
*Jordaan, S.M., Combs, C.*, and E. Guenther. (2021).
Advances in Applied Energy, p.100058
Quantifying the ecosystem services values of electricity generation in the US Chihuahuan Desert: A life cycle perspective
*Jordaan, S. M., J. Lee.*, M. McClung, and M. Moran. (2021).
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Potential uses of coal mine methane in China and associated benefits for air quality, health and climate
*Zhang, M.,* S. Miller, S. M. Jordaan, W. Peng, and Q. Zhang. (2020).
Environmental Science & Technology, 54(19):12447-12455
Grid-scale Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Benefits of Renewable, Storage and Carbon Pricing Options
*Jordaan, S. M., Q. Xu, and B. Hobbs. (2020).
Environmental Science & Technology, 54(17):10435-10445
The climate mitigation opportunity behind global power transmission and distribution
*Surana, K., and S. M. Jordaan.‡ (2019).
Nature Climate Change, 9: 660–665
On Methane Emissions from Shale Gas Development
*Umeozor, E. C.,* S. M. Jordaan, and I. D. Gates. (2018).
Energy, 152:594-600
A spatially-resolved inventory analysis of the water consumed by the coal-to-gas transition of Pennsylvania
*Jordaan, S. M., L. A. Patterson, and L. Diaz Anadon. (2018).
Journal of Cleaner Production, 184:366–374
Country-level Life Cycle Assessment of Liquefied Natural Gas Trade for Electricity Generation
*Kasumu, A.,* V. Li,* J. W. Coleman, J. Liendo,* S. M. Jordaan. (2018).
Environmental Science & Technology, 52(4):1735–1746
Understanding the life cycle surface land requirements of natural gas-fired electricity
*Jordaan, S. M., G. A. Heath, J. Macknick, E. Mohammadi,* D. Ben-Horin, V. Urrea, and D. Marceau. (2017).
Nature Energy, 2:804–812
Regional water implications of reducing oil imports with liquid transportation fuel alternatives in the United States
*Jordaan, S. M., L. D. Anadon, E. Mielke, and D. P. Schrag. (2013).
Environmental Science & Technology, 47(21): 11976–11984
Evaluating the role of cogeneration for carbon management in Alberta
*Doluweera, G., S. M. Jordaan, M. Moore, D. W. Keith, and J. A. Bergerson. (2011).
Energy Policy, 39:7963–7974
Quantifying land use of oil sands production: a life cycle perspective
*Jordaan, S. M., D. W. Keith, and B. Stelfox. (2009).
Environmental Research Letters, 4:024004
Book Chapters
The Power of Life Cycle Assessment: Data Driven Decision Making for Environmental Sustainability
*Wright, L., Fava, J., Jordaan, S. M., Levy, M., Severinghaus, S., Nebel, B., E. Wang.* (2023).
American Center for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA).
Wells to wire: life cycle assessment of natural gas-fired electricity
*Jordaan, S. M.* (2021).
Springer Nature.
Reports
Carbon Utilization Infrastructure, Markets, and Research and Development: A Final Report
*National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.* (2024).
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.